Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11067/6356
Title: Assessing the dimensionality of student school engagement survey : support for a multidimensional bifactor model
Author: Inman, Richard A.
Moreira, Paulo
Cunha, Diana
Castro, Jorge
Keywords: Student engagement
Student school engagement survey
Bifactor model
Construct validity
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: Elsevier. Science Direct
Citation: Inman, R. A.; Moreira, P; Cunha, D.; Castro, J. (2020).Assessing the dimensionality of the student school engagement survey: support for a multidimensional bifactor model, Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.), Vol. 25, Issue 2, 2020, Pages 109-118, ISSN 2530-3805, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2020.03.001.
Abstract: The Student School Engagement Survey (SSES) is used to evaluate student engagement interventions run by the National Center for Student Engagement in the U.S. It was designed to measure the behavioral, emotional, and cognitive components of engagement, but its factorial structure has not been validated. To address this limitation, we tested the factorial structure of the Portuguese version of the SSES using a representative sample of 4,866 adolescents. An exploratory factor analysis revealed five theoretically meaningful factors describing subtypes of emotional and behavioral engagement, and teacher support for learning. A confirmatory factor analysis supported modelling a shortened version of the SSES with a bifactor model. Bifactor indices indicated total SSES scores are interpretable as a measure of a single student engagement construct. Finally, as evidence of concurrent validity, the scale had a strong positive correlation with an established measure of student engagement. The proposed version of the SSES is a psychometrically adequate measure of student engagement, although cannot be said to measure cognitive engagement.
Description: This document is the authors’ version of the final accepted manuscript, published online in 27.4.2020 by Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.). doi: 10.1016/j.psicoe.2020.03.001 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S253038052030006X
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Prof. Paulo Moreira, Instituto de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade Lusíada, Rua de Moçambique 21 e 71, Porto 4100-348, Portugal. Email: paulomoreira@por.ulusiada.pt
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Prof. Paulo Moreira, Instituto de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade Lusíada, Rua de Moçambique 21 e 71, Porto 4100-348, Portugal. Email: paulomoreira@por.ulusiada.pt
Peer reviewed: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11067/6356
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2020.03.001
Document Type: Article
Appears in Collections:[ILID-CIPD] Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2020_Rev.Psico.Eng - SSES.pdfArticle743,89 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons