Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/11067/5722
Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, Paulo-
dc.contributor.authorRamalho, Sofia-
dc.contributor.authorInman, Richard A.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-14T11:26:01Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-14T11:26:01Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000619-
dc.identifier.citationMoreira, P. A. S., Ramalho, S., Inman, R. (2020). The Engagement/Disengagement in Sustainable Development Inventory (EDiSDI). European Journal of Psychological Assessment.Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000619pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2151-2426-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11067/5722-
dc.descriptionCorresponding Author:Paulo A. S. Moreira, Institute of Psychology and Education, University Lusiada North (Porto), 4200 Porto, Portugal, E-mail paulomoreira@por.ulusiada.pt-
dc.descriptionThis version of the article may not completely replicate the final authoritative version published in European Journal of Psychological Assessment at https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000619. It is not the version of record and is therefore not suitable for citation. Please do not copy or cite without the permission of the author(s).-
dc.description.abstractThere is an urgent need to meet the goals outlined in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Such advancements require people to adopt pro sustainable development behaviors. Research on engagement with sustainable development has the potential to provide a vital understanding of how individual differences and contextual factors interact to shape such behaviors. Our aim was to offer a theoretical framework for engagement, imported from Educational Psychology, and from it develop the Engagement/Disengagement in Sustainable Development Inventory (EDiSDI). In Study 1 (n = 266; Mage = 38.6 years; 83% female), an exploratory factor analysis identified three engagement and three disengagement factors. In Study 2 (n = 510; Mage = 31.6 years; 58% female), confirmatory factor analyses supported a bifactor model with two negatively correlated general factors (engagement and disengagement). Using a bifactor model, engagement was positively (and disengagement negatively) correlated with nature relatedness, environmental identity, and environmental action. Item response theory analyses revealed good item discrimination. These results validate both the proposed framework and EDiSDI for use in research on engagement with sustainable development. Future research is needed to determine if engagement and disengagement in sustainable development are distinct constructs, or opposing ends of a continuum.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherHogrefe Publishingpt_PT
dc.relationFCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia-
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_PT
dc.subjectSustainable developmentpt_PT
dc.subjectEngagementpt_PT
dc.subjectDisengagementpt_PT
dc.subjectBifactor modelpt_PT
dc.titleThe Engagement/Disengagement in Sustainable Development Inventory (EDiSDI)pt_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
Aparece nas colecções:[ILID-CIPD] Artigos

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
2020_Eur.J.Psychol.Assess - EDISDI.pdfarticle654,23 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Ver/Abrir


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpace
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Todos os registos no repositório estão protegidos por leis de copyright, com todos os direitos reservados.